I do not have possession of the film. Last I heard my aunt, Kathy, had it. If you are interested you can call her shop "All Animal Grooming" in Redding California. I am sure she would welcome telling the story. She would know more about where it was actually shown. I think the old theaters that he showed it in are no longer running, but I don't know.
Any idea where this was printed? The movie the back cover mentions played Nov 12-20, 1977 at five different locations according to Newspapers.com. I'm researching for a book on, well, monsters that were written about by the late ufologist and hoaxer Gray Barker and I'm trying to figure out what vanity press they used.
I'd love to be able to confirm that. Do you have a photo of the film? A still from the film? A theater I can contact to verify it was shown? Anything tangible?
I do not have possession of the film. Last I heard my aunt, Kathy, had it. If you are interested you can call her shop "All Animal Grooming" in Redding California. I am sure she would welcome telling the story. She would know more about where it was actually shown. I think the old theaters that he showed it in are no longer running, but I don't know.
Ed's my grandfather. He always tells this story. Kathy swears by it. He heavily disputes what was said in the paper about Cherie. He actually used to show the film in local theaters and the story goes the FBI approached him and made him stop. I've seen his films before and although we dont have a way to play them any more, you can kind of make out the shadows in the film under the light.
I'd love to be able to confirm that. Do you have a photo of the film? A still from the film? A theater I can contact to verify it was shown? Anything tangible?
I do not have possession of the film. Last I heard my aunt, Kathy, had it. If you are interested you can call her shop "All Animal Grooming" in Redding California. I am sure she would welcome telling the story. She would know more about where it was actually shown. I think the old theaters that he showed it in are no longer running, but I don't know.
I love 'weighed about six hundred pounds or more': well, which is it? About? Or more? That said, most BBC and newspaper journalism does exactly the same most days of the week. And 'quite possibly the most dangerous beast in the mountains': again, make your collective mind up! All this grammatical nitpicking is a way of not dealing with the appalling story (sic) and the magnificent cover art - it was B. Kliban who talked about 'nephew art', and this is a prime example. (Hey, if Ed captured the abduction on film, why don't the authors use a still from the film? Oh. Right.)
I do not have possession of…
I do not have possession of the film. Last I heard my aunt, Kathy, had it. If you are interested you can call her shop "All Animal Grooming" in Redding California. I am sure she would welcome telling the story. She would know more about where it was actually shown. I think the old theaters that he showed it in are no longer running, but I don't know.
Any idea where this was…
Any idea where this was printed? The movie the back cover mentions played Nov 12-20, 1977 at five different locations according to Newspapers.com. I'm researching for a book on, well, monsters that were written about by the late ufologist and hoaxer Gray Barker and I'm trying to figure out what vanity press they used.
Regards,
Tony Breeden
TonyBreedenBook.com
I'd love to be able to…
I'd love to be able to confirm that. Do you have a photo of the film? A still from the film? A theater I can contact to verify it was shown? Anything tangible?
Regards,
Tony Breeden
TonyBreedenBooks.com
I do not have possession of…
I do not have possession of the film. Last I heard my aunt, Kathy, had it. If you are interested you can call her shop "All Animal Grooming" in Redding California. I am sure she would welcome telling the story. She would know more about where it was actually shown. I think the old theaters that he showed it in are no longer running, but I don't know.
Ed's my grandfather. He…
Ed's my grandfather. He always tells this story. Kathy swears by it. He heavily disputes what was said in the paper about Cherie. He actually used to show the film in local theaters and the story goes the FBI approached him and made him stop. I've seen his films before and although we dont have a way to play them any more, you can kind of make out the shadows in the film under the light.
:)
I'd love to be able to…
I'd love to be able to confirm that. Do you have a photo of the film? A still from the film? A theater I can contact to verify it was shown? Anything tangible?
Regards,
Tony Breeden
TonyBreedenBooks.com
I do not have possession of…
I do not have possession of the film. Last I heard my aunt, Kathy, had it. If you are interested you can call her shop "All Animal Grooming" in Redding California. I am sure she would welcome telling the story. She would know more about where it was actually shown. I think the old theaters that he showed it in are no longer running, but I don't know.
I love 'weighed about six
I love 'weighed about six hundred pounds or more': well, which is it? About? Or more? That said, most BBC and newspaper journalism does exactly the same most days of the week. And 'quite possibly the most dangerous beast in the mountains': again, make your collective mind up! All this grammatical nitpicking is a way of not dealing with the appalling story (sic) and the magnificent cover art - it was B. Kliban who talked about 'nephew art', and this is a prime example. (Hey, if Ed captured the abduction on film, why don't the authors use a still from the film? Oh. Right.)